Skip to content

HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA

HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA (LATREILLE 1825)

EUKARYA> UNIKONTA> OPISTHOKONTA> ANIMALIA> BILATERIA> PROTOSTOMATA> ECDYSOZOA> PANARTHROPODA> ARTHROPODA> HEXAPODA
This taxonomy of the Subphylum Hexapoda has 3 classes. Brusca and Brusca (2003) lump the collembolans, proturans and diplurans into a single class that they call Entognatha. However, even they conclude that the diplurans likely are convergent in their major characters (especially the mouthparts on which the group is defined). Therefore, I believe that the diplurans should be separated into a different class. So, I have used the taxonomy of Hales (2001) for the collembolans, proturans and diplurans and divided them into two classes (see below). The taxonomy of the Class Insecta, however, follows the system of Brusca and Brusca (2003).

CLASS ELLIPURA (2 ORDERS AFTER HALES, 2001)

  • Small; wingless; mouth entognathous (base of mouthparts within head capsule); mandibles with single articulation; legs with one tarsus (not articulated); with or without tracheae; abdomen 6 segments (colembolans) or 11 segments (proturans).
    • Entomobrya, Achorutes.
    • Acerentulus.

CLASS DIPLURATA (1 ORDER AFTER HALES, 2001)

  • Small; no wings; no eyes; no external genitalia and no Malpighian tubules; mouthparts entognathous; mandible with single articulation, rolling action, abdomen 11-segmented when embryonic, fewer when mature, gonopores on 9th segment; 7 pairs of abdominal styli, 1 pair of cerci, up to 7 pairs of abdominal spiracles.
    • Campodea, Japyx.

CLASS INSECTA (3 SUBCLASSES AFTER BRUSCA AND BRUSCA, 2003)

  • SUBCLASS ARCHAEOGNATHA (1 ORDER)
    • Wingless; ocelli and compound eyes (contiguous); body scaly; mandibles with single articulation; tarsi with 3 articulated segments; some legs with exites (not uniramous); abdomen with “leglets” on segments; caudal filaments. Jumping bristletails.
  • SUBCLASS ZYGOENTOMA (1 ORDER THYSANURA)
    • Wingless; mouthparts ectognathous, mandible with 2 articulations; hypopharynx with 1 lobe; head with clypeus and clypeofrontal sulcus; small maxillary palps; only basal scape of antennae with muscles; abdomen 11-segmented with 3-8 pairs of styli; tergum of 11th segment prolonged into articulated cercal filaments of equivalent length; female gonopores on 8th segment, male gonopores on 10th; without ocelli; reduced compound eyes; without copulatory organs; thoracic and abdominal segments with well-developed transverse tendon system ventral; tracheal system complex, with longitudinal trunks, molting continues after maturity.
      • Lepisma, Thermobia.
  • SUBCLASS PTERYGOTA (30 ORDERS)
  • One pair of wings (unless lost) on both 2nd and 3rd thoracic segments; ectognathous mouthparts; mandible with 2 articulations; hypopharynx with 1 lobe; maxillary palps small; head with clypeus and clypeofrontal sulcus; only basal scape of antennae with muscles; without abdominal styli except on genital segments; female gonopores on 8th segment, male gonopores on 10th; copulation occurs, female often with ovipositor, eggs with amnion and chorion; epicuticle waterproof; without transverse tendon system in thoracic or abdominal segments; molting ceases at maturity.
    • Subclass Hemimetabola: Gryllus, Anisomorpha, Periplaneta, Stagomomantis, Tetrix, Microcentrum, Gryllotalpa, Forficula, Perla, Pteronarcys, Reticulotermes, Kalotermes, Macrotermes, Embia, Pararhagadochir, Gynembia, Gomphus, Anax, Libellula, Lestes, Agrion, Argia, Ephemera, Hexagenia, Potamanthus, Baetis, Menopon, Goniodes, Trichodectes, Pediculus, Phthirius, Psocus, Psocathropos, Trogium, Atropos, Hercothrips, Heliothrips, Thrips, Zorotypus, Leptocoris, Murgantia, Pangaeus, Eurygaster, Nezara, Anasa, Blissus, Corythucha, Phymata, Arilus, Nabis, Cimex, Orius, Lygus, Halticus, Gerris, Gelastocoris Ranatra, Lethocerus, Notonecta, Arctocorixa, Scolops, Magicicada, Ceresa, Aphrophora, Graphocephala, Oncometopia, Paratrioza, Trialeurodes, Myzus, Pseudococcus, Icerya, Lepidosaphes.
    • Subclass Holometabola: Panorpa, Bittacus, Hydropsyche, Helicopsyche, Rhyacophila, Goera, Corydalus, Chrysopa, Myrmeleon, Coleophora, Tinea, Tineola, Plutella, Sanninoidea, Gnorimoschema, Carpocapsa, Polychrosis, Archips, Pyrausta, Loxostege, Hypsopygia, Crambus, Diatraea, Plodia, Thridopteryx, Estigmene, Hyphantria, Catocala, Trichoplusia, Agrotis, Heliothis, Datana, Hemerocampa, Protoparce, Alsophila, Synchlora, Malacosoma, Samia, Tropaea, Proteides, Polites, Iphiclides, Colias, Danaus, Minois, Vanessa, Phycoides, Lycaenopsis, Lycaena, Atlides, Cicendela, Calosoma, Harpalus, Dytiscus, Dineutes, Hydrophilus, Silpha, Paederus, Hister, Calopteron, Photinus, Chauliognathus, Enoclerus, Agriotes, Chrysobothris, Dermestes, Adalia, Mordellistena, Epicauta, Alobates, Tribolium, Lyctus, Amphicerus, Ptinus, Canthon, Phyllophaga, Popilius, Pseudoleucanus, Saperda, Leptinotarsa, Altica, Callosobruchus, Cylas, Pulex, Ctenocephalides, Xenosylla, Tipula, Aedes, Simulium, Tendipes, Phytophaga, Stratiomys, Tabanus, Chrysops Rhagio, Bombylius, Asilus, Diploneura, Drosophila, Liriomyza, Musca, Oestrus, Sarcophaga, Xenos, Stylops, Caliroa, Tremex, Megarhyssa, Macrocentrus, Torymus, Harmolita, Trichogramma, Scelio, Pelecinus, Formica, Campototus, Pepsis, Polistes, Bembix, Colletes, Halictus, Bombus, Apis.
LITERATURE CITED

Averof, M. and M. Akam. 1995. Insect-crustacean relationships: insights from comparative developmental and molecular studies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B. 347: 293-303.

Ax, P. 2000. Multicellular Animals II. Springer Verlag. Berlin.

Brusca, R. C. and G. J. Brusca. 2003. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, Mass.
Buchsbaum, R. 1938. Animals Without Backbones, An Introduction to the Invertebrates. The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.

Budd, G. E. 1998. Arthropod body plan evolution in the Cambrian with an example from anomalocaridid muscle. Lethaia. 31: 197-210.

Budd, G. E. 2001. Tardigrades as ‘Stem-Group Arthropods’: The evidence from the Cambrian fauna. Zool. Anz. 240: 265-279.

Conway Morris, S. (1998). The Crucible of Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals. Oxford [Oxfordshire]: Oxford University Press. pp. 56–9.

Dunn, C.W., A. Hejnol, D.Q. Matus, K. Pang, W.E. Browne, S.A. Smith, E. Seaver, G.W. Rouse, M. Obst, G.D. Edgecombe, M.V. Sørensen, S.H.D. Haddock, A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, A. Okusu, R.M. Kristensen, W.C. Wheeler, M.Q. Martindale, and G. Giribet. 2008. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature. 452: 745-749.

Garey, J. R. 2001. Ecdysozoa: The relationship between Cycloneuralia and Panarthropoda. Zoologischer Anzeiger 240: 321-330.

Giribet, G., G. D. Edgecombe, J. M. Carpenter, C. A. D’Haese, and W. C. Wheeler. 2004. Is Ellipura monophyletic? A combined analysis of basal hexapod relationships with emphasis on the origin of insects. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution. 4: 319-340.

Hales, D. F. 2001. The Hexapoda. In: Anderson, D. T., ed. Invertebrate Zoology. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press. Oxford. pp. 232–274.

Hickman, C. P. 1973. Biology of the Invertebrates. The C. V. Mosby Company. Saint Louis.

Ivantsov, A. Yu. 2004. New Proarticulata from the Vendian of the Arkhangel’sk Region. Paleontological Journal. 38(3): 247-253.

Lavrov, D. V., W. M. Brown, and J. L. Boore. 2004. Phylogenetic position of the Pentastomida and (pan)crustacean relationships. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 271: 537-544.

Mallatt, J. M., J. R. Garey, and J. W. Shultz. 2003. Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Baysean inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 31: 178-191.

Manton, S. F. 1977. The arthropod habits, functional morphology, and evolution. Clarendon Press. Oxford.

Margulis, L. and K. Schwartz. 1998. Five kingdoms, an illustrated guide to the phyla of life on earth. 3rd Edition. W. H. Freeman and Company. New York.

Mayer, G. 2006. Structure and development of onychophoran eyes: What is the ancestral visual organ in arthropods? Arthropod Structure and Development. 35: 231-245.

Mayer, G. and P. M. Whittington. 2009. Velvet worm development links myriapods with chelicerates. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences. Royal Society
Nielsen, C. 2001. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla. 2nd Edition. Oxford University Press. Oxford.

Patel, N. H., E. Martin-Blanco, K. G. Coleman, S. J. Poole, M. C. Ellis, T. B. Kornberg, and C. S. Goodman. 1989. Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. Cell. 58: 955-968.

Pechenik, J. A. 2005. Biology of the Invertebrates. McGraw-Hill. New York.

Regier, J. C., J. W. Shultz, and R. E. Kambic. 2005. Pancrustacean phylogeny: hexapods are terrestrial crustaceans and maxillopods are not monophyletic. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. 272: 395-401.

Reiger, J. C., J. W. Schultz, A. R. D. Ganley, A. Hussey, D. Shi, B. Ball, A. Zwick, J. E. Stajich, M. P. Cummings, J. W. Martin, and C. W. Cunningham. 2008)Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Systematic Biology. 57(6): 920-938.

Ruppert, E. E. and R. D. Barnes. 1994. Invertebrate Zoology. 6th edition. Saunders. Ft Worth, TX.

Ruppert, E. E., R. S. Fox, and R. D. Barnes. 2004. Invertebrate Zoology: A Functional Evolutionary Approach. Seventh Edition. Thomson, Brooks/Cole. New York. pp. 1-963.

Strausfeld, N. J., C. M. Strausfeld, R. Loesel, D. Rowell, and S. Stowe. 2006. Arthropod phylogeny: onychophoran brain organization suggests an archaic relationship with a chelicerate stem lineage. Proc. R. Soc. London. B. 273: 1857-1866.

Telford, M. J. S. J. Bourlat, A. Economou, D. Papillion, and O. Rota-Stabelli. 2008. The evolution of Ecdysozoa. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 363: 1529-1537.

Tudge, C. 2000. The Variety of Life, A Survey and a Celebration of all the Creatures That Have Ever Lived. Oxford University Press. New York.

Waggoner, B. M. 1996. Phylogenetic hypotheses of the relationships of arthropods to Precambrian and Cambrian problematic fossil taxa. Systematic Biology 45(2): 190-222.

Whittington, H. B. and D. E. G. Briggs. 1985. The largest Cambrian animal, Anomalocaris, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. B. 309: 569-609.

Willmer, P. 1990. Invertebrate relationships, patterns in animal evolution. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
By Jack R. Holt and Carlos A. Iudica. Last revised: 02/04/2012
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Skip to toolbar