Susquehanna University is an institution of higher education that brings learners of different backgrounds, experiences, and talents into dialogue as they pursue knowledge and wisdom together.
To this end, we embrace the principles of free expression outlined by the American Association of University Professors:
Freedom of thought and expression is essential to any institution of higher learning. Universities and colleges exist not only to transmit knowledge. Equally, they interpret, explore, and expand that knowledge by testing the old and proposing the new. This mission guides learning outside the classroom quite as much as in class, and often inspires vigorous debate on those social, economic, and political issues that arouse the strongest passions. In the process, views will be expressed that may seem to many wrong, distasteful, or offensive. Such is the nature of freedom to sift and winnow ideas.[1]
We recognize that to foster an environment conducive to free discourse and debate, under most circumstances, the University itself should maintain a position of neutrality on the topics of the day, except when those subjects are clearly in alignment or at odds with our institutional mission or the “Statement on Ethical and Inclusive Living.” This practice closely aligns with the “Kalven Report” adopted by the University of Chicago:
A university has a great and unique role to play in fostering the development of social and political values in a society. The role is defined by the distinctive mission of the university and defined too by the distinctive characteristics of the university as a community. It is a role for the long term. The mission of the university is the discovery, improvement, and dissemination of knowledge. Its domain of inquiry and scrutiny includes all aspects and all values of society. A university faithful to its mission will provide enduring challenges to social values, policies, practices, and institutions. By design and by effect, it is the institution which creates discontent with the existing social arrangements and proposes new ones. In brief, a good university, like Socrates, will be upsetting.[2]
The aforementioned “Statement on Ethical and Inclusive Living,” affirms that:
We commit to maintaining and fostering a safe and welcoming campus environment that aids us all in the process of lifelong learning and the cultivation of good character. As Susquehanna continues its quest to embody the rich diversity of the human community, we are committed to the full participation of all persons representing the breadth of human differences.
[We]invite wonder into our daily lives. There is always more to understand and more opportunity for improvement in how we live our lives. We strive to learn more about our world and ourselves, and how we can make a positive impact on each. We understand that our curiosity may sometimes lead to discomfort as we confront difficult issues and ideas, and we resolve not to avoid such challenges.
[We]commit to having safe, respectful, and authentic dialogues. We emphasize freedom of thought, freedom of expression, and freedom of speech. We believe benefits are derived from sharing perspectives, understandings, and expectations with others – even when they may be in conflict with those held by some in the community. These conflicts are not to be avoided, but threatening or hateful acts are never tolerated. Talking across difference is an opportunity for learning and growth.[3]
As we promote free expression and inquiry, we demonstrate to our students and our community the importance of promoting and navigating an exchange of countervailing positions in strengthening our democracy and enriching the marketplace of ideas.
[1] American Association of University Professors: “On Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes,” adopted November 1994.
[2] “Kalven Committee: Report on the University’s Role in Political and Social Action.” University of Chicago: Record, vol. 1, no. 1 (11 November 1967).
[3] “Susquehanna University Statement on Ethical and Inclusive Living.” This statement sets forth the University’s values and goals; however, it does not create enforceable contractual rights.